Is inbox zero worth it? A smaller goal that works better
Updated
Short answer: Inbox zero is worth it the way Merlin Mann meant it: deciding quickly what each email needs, not keeping the count at zero. Go through email at a few set times a day (delete, delegate, respond, defer or do), and aim for a smaller goal: no reply owed without an answer or a date. A full inbox with nobody waiting on you is fine; an empty one with a forgotten promise in the archive isn’t.
Merlin Mann named Inbox Zero in a series of posts on his blog, 43 Folders, in March 2006, and gave a talk on it at Google in 2007. It became shorthand for an empty inbox, which isn’t what he meant. In a 2013 essay he wrote that the zero is “not about the number of email messages that are sitting in your inbox”: it’s about how much of your attention goes to what’s piling up.
What the method actually is
In the 2007 talk, Mann gives five verbs for every email, roughly in order of preference: delete (archiving counts), delegate, respond, defer and do. You get to zero by deciding, not by answering everything: real work moves out of the inbox to a place of its own, and the rest is archived.
Why chasing the number backfires
- Email already takes a big share of the week. McKinsey estimated in 2012 that knowledge workers spend about 28 percent of the workweek managing email.
- Checking constantly to keep the count at zero makes it worse. In a 2015 study by Kostadin Kushlev and Elizabeth Dunn, people who checked email three times a day for a week reported less daily stress than in a week of checking whenever they liked, and they didn’t answer fewer emails.
- Zero doesn’t tell you what matters. You can archive your way to an empty inbox with a promise buried in it, and a full inbox of newsletters with nobody waiting on you is fine.
A smaller goal: nobody waiting on you
Instead of counting messages, count obligations: replies you owe, answers you’re waiting on, and things you promised. Keep that list short and dated, and let everything else sit until you have time, or forever.
Two kinds of zero
| Inbox zero | Nobody waiting | |
|---|---|---|
| What you count | Messages in your inbox | People waiting on you |
| You’re done when | The inbox is empty | Every reply owed is answered or has a date |
| Newsletters and FYIs | Have to be filed | Can sit unread |
How to do it in a few minutes a day
- Check email at set times, two or three a day, with notifications off in between.
- In each session, decide every new message: archive it, hand it off, answer it now if that takes two minutes, or put it on your list with a date.
- Keep that list outside your inbox, so archiving never hides something you owe.
- Before you stop for the day, look at the list, not the inbox count.
Questions people ask
What does inbox zero actually mean?
It’s Merlin Mann’s 2006 method for deciding quickly what each email needs: delete, delegate, respond, defer or do. He later wrote that the zero refers to how much attention your inbox takes, not how many messages are in it.
Is inbox zero realistic?
An inbox that’s always empty isn’t, for most people, and it doesn’t need to be. Going through email to zero decisions a few times a day is realistic, and so is keeping a short list of the replies you owe.
How often should I check email?
At a few set times a day rather than all the time. In Kushlev and Dunn’s 2015 study, checking three times a day lowered people’s daily stress without them answering fewer emails.
Sources
What this guide says about other products and research comes from these sources, checked on the date above.